By

BBC 6music: the station John Peel would have made

I’m not just an insufurably grumpy geek, I’m not just the guy complaining about everything in the corner of the office – I’m also the annoying one passing on CDs of new music all the time and raving about new bands I’ve heard.

I get my music in many different ways – promoters and bands send it to me (en mass some days), I get mp3s, I use the BBC Introducing uploader, I use MySpace BUT mostly I make use of 6music.

Read More

By

It’s not all about the money

Everytime a public organisation comes up with what is basically a good idea, something that will provide interesting content for free for the public in an easy to use way – somebody, usually somebody running a private company – jumps up and down and screams about it hurting the ‘commercial sector’.

I can completely understand a newspaper group getting a little anxious when they’ve got a big new service ready to launch, advertising in place and then someone like the BBC, the Government or another publicly funded body launches an almost identical service with tax payers money – but how often does that actually happen.

Most of the time the excuses for objecting to a cool new public service site, channel or project is that it would stop the private company from being able to create something similar in the future – thus cutting off a potential revenue stream.

But for me that is where the argument completely falls down – in most cases the public service version would be advertising free and as the commercial version would probably be advertising funded – I don’t see where the competition is?

OK so there would be a little bit of competing for eyeballs but I like to think that people are smart enough to rely on more than one source for their news and information – I use Twitter and Facebook even though Facebook is fast becoming Twitter.

I read every major newspaper website, I read more than one blog, even if they’re on the same subject and belong to several forums covering the same subject area.

What I’m saying is – why does it matter if the BBC runs a service similar to one a commercial company might run when the commercial company will live or die by advertising revenue (charging for things on the web doesn’t work unless its a mobile app) and the BBC won’t be taking advertising?

Equally why shouldn’t a local council create a local online television service to let people know what is happening in their town if they can afford it – although if they’re cutting other services I would suggest maybe thinking again?

In fact, scrap the example above as that really just seems to be about promoting the council – what councils should really be doing, and this would help local newspapers – is filming all council meetings and then providing a feed – for free – to all the newspapers, radio stations and other media in their area.

Those media services could then broadcast that feed on their sites, cut up videos/speeches to publish with articles and even be able to properly cover local council meetings without having to send a reporter – it could just be on a TV in the background in the newsroom.

This would provide local news services with free content, would allow them to have a journalist doing something else and would hopefully encourage greater transparency in local government.

If councils have the money to launch a TV service or newspaper promoting the council – surely that money would be better spent actually covering council meetings.

In fact, maybe that is something the BBC could help fund with some of the ‘digital switchover money’ instead of giving it to ITV or other broadcasters.

It could be an extention of the digital democracy project but instead of it all being broadcast on the BBC – it could be part of BBC Parliament with a branding free feed offered to each of the relevant local newspapers, websites, blogs and radio stations.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

By

The future of paid music – rights!

2811886737_00b0ce3c2d_b

We Are Scientists at Jersey Live 2008

My job involves a number of different things – part of it involves writing political stories, another part involves writing stories about toilets turned into cafes.

But the part I’m going to draw on now is the one that involves me writing stories, doing interviews and even presenting a show all about music – particularly music created by new, unsigned bands.

Download my interview with Barney Hooper of PRS (mp3) >

The BBC has a strand of – currently – radio and online programming called Introducing. The brand carries across Radio 1 with Huw Stephens and Steve Lemacq and on 6music with Tom Robinson.

It also carries across the BBC Local Radio network as well – with shows on almost every local radio station, shows for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland on BBC Radio 1 and more still online.

Each one of these shows plays unsigned bands, or at least bands that are signed but usually to small labels with little or no hope of making it to mainstream playlists – at least not any time soon.

BBC Jersey IntroducingEvery time one of these bands gets played by one of these shows – and there are dozens of them across the country – the producer of the show (or someone else on the bigger stations) logs the music.

That log, that detailed log with information on when, how long, who and what you’ve played is sent to PRS – the music rights collection agency.

That information is then used to pay those bands that are members of PRS. The amount a band gets paid depends on how long the song is and how big the radio station is.

I spoke to Barney Hooper, Head of PR for PRS and he explained the scale. He said: “It really varies. A tiny radio station it would be less than £1 a minute if their music is used and up to £30 a minute on Radio 1.”

But you have to be a PRS member to get the money.

In the past this has been pretty prohibitive as the cost of membership was somewhere approaching £200. Even if you’re played on BBC Radio 1 a couple of times this still doesn’t pay for itself.

However, PRS have now re-branded themselves and changed their pricing structure for bands – partly by chasing more businesses for licences and money.

DSC_0646

The Twang at Jersey Live 2008

Barney explained the new cost of membership to PRS has now been reduced to £10, but you don’t even have to pay that straight away.

He said: “that is deffered until your first Royalty Payment. So pretty much membership is free now and £10 deducted out of the first cheque you get – so it doesn’t cost you anything just to sign up with us.”

So by signing up as a songwriter and agreeing to give them £10 from your first royalty cheque you’ll get paid every time your song is played on the radio.

As well as the BBC there is also an increasing number of commercial radio stations playing occasional tracks from unsigned local bands – and unsigned not so local bands.

Getting a three minute track played on Radio 1 would more than cover the cost of joining and give you a bit of cash to boot.

But it isn’t just radio play that gets a band/songwriter money after becoming a PRS member. If you tell them what gigs you’ve played and where they will give you £5 per gig – if you have a song/video on YouTube you get around 1p per viewer.

In fact Barney explained that one as well: “In 2007 we were the first society in the world to licence YouTube, so if music is up on YouTube being played and being watched – a small amount of money comes back to us.

“The amounts are very small, just to manage expectations, I can’t remember the exact number but it is less than a penny per watch. Money will still be earned but you do have to have your videos watched a lot and your music heard a lot for that to come through to you.”

So a band that gigs every few days, works hard to get their music played on local radio, national radio and even internet radio – has a video on YouTube that gets a steady stream of views per week and even works to get their music into adverts and video games – you could earn something close to a living wage without selling a single CD or download.

But there is a flip side to this – the people that pay the rights collectors.

It is well known and expected that a radio station pays for the music it plays but what might not be as well known is the fact that any business that has music playing needs a licence.

Simon Cowell at the :en:National Television Aw...
Image via Wikipedia

The exception to this is lone workers. Here’s Barney again: “Not lone workers, the law actually could specify that anyone listening to music in a commercial or business environment would have to have a music licence from us but we don’t licence lone workers, we don’t licence businesses in domestic premesis. Any small business with more than two workers would require a licence from us.”

He does give a rough insight into the cost of that licence: “If you’ve got a workplace, an office or small business with five or fewer employees then the licence is £44 per year plus VAT – less than a £1 per week basically. And then you’ve got access to all the music you can imagine.”

Basically this money for bands, the ability to give these smaller bands more revenue on a more regular basis is coming from the increasingly strict enforcement of the music licence requirements.

Any garage with the radio on will need a licence, any office listening to CDs on a regular basis will need a licence, any hairdressers listening to an iPod over speakers – licence.

Of course you could always ignore that and only play podsafe or non-PRS registered bands – maybe bands could start labelling their music NON-PRS – but when it costs nothing to become PRS registered and you get money everytime you’re music is played anywhere – why would you?

Surely it is worth the relatively small fee charged for a PRS licence to help keep music being made by the next generation of briliant British bands and musicians?

Music that is coming from the heart and soul and not from the corporate think tank – music made in a garage and back street pub and not over coffee in a five star resteraunt.

Maybe the licence could be extended – I’d pay £50 a year on top of my broadband subsciption for the right to download any music I like – but I’m not convinced £5 a month will be enough for the likes of Simon Cowel.

But what about if that £5 gave you unlimited access to independent music – how quickly would the major labels tow the line – especially if the downloads covered by my £5 a month counted towards the chart positions?

More from me:
Jersey Introducing on Twitter | My photos of bands | Jersey Introducing on MySpace

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]