Complain for free

December 11, 2006 by upyourego 

According to The Register web designers are complaining that they’re being fined and charged by Getty for using images on websites or stories they haven’t paid for!

Buncefield (c)Today is a good dayMy first reaction was mixed, take half from the side of the web designer “I brought the template, how was I supposed to know” and half from the photo agency “we own the photo you should pay for it” and you get my position.

A register reader (and probably web designer) has said “Website owners may have used [template] sites… or third party web designers where the implied status of the templates from these sources would indicate a royalty-free status.”

So with that in mind it’s a little bit crappy of Getty to target these individuals who don’t know any better, it would be more appropriate to say “we own the copyright to that image, please remove it or pay for it”.

However it looks like Getty are telling website owners to just pay up and are fining them.

Again according to the reg, a spokeswoman for Getty said it had been using a firm called Picscout to scan the web for COMMERCIAL websites - not hobbyists or bloggers using their photos without permission.

The first thing this says to me is “Yes I can use Getty Images and they’ll leave me alone” but I know it doesn’t work like that and it’s not really necessary.

You can buy photos for next to nothing to use on your blog through sites like iStockPhoto.com and LuckyOliver.com and for free in other places.

If you look to sites like the Stock Exchange at sxc.hu or do a search on flickr from Creative Commons photos there is a near endless supply of suitable pics to use on your site or with your story. Or if you want more than just photos the Creative commons search is a good one as well.

Most of the photos on this site (that I haven’t taken myself) have come from Flickr and the rest from iStockPhoto. As an example of the photos you can get for free I’ve included a hot issue photo on this story.

I went to the Guardian and looked at the top stories, the top story was the missing prostitutes so I looked the second story, the shooting of Hamas critics. Unfortunatly if I were to use any of the brilliant Hamas supporter photos on Flickr I would risk making it look like the people photographed were responsible - something I’m not going to do.

So I decided to go with photos of the Buncefield Oil Depot fire in Hemel Hempstead that happened a year ago. It’s a BBC News front page story and there are some incredible photos on Flickr.

As a side note, I’m a massive fan of Getty images and have spent a long time in the past looking at some of the incredible pieces of photo journalism their photographers get. Plus I’ve used their sport photos for stories on the BBC website (where the BBC has a contract with them).

Maybe Getty could offer a blogger licence - say 50p/£1 for a small blog (use Technorati rankings to judge how much to charge). Should open them up another market - I’d pay a small fee for a top quality photo related to a current story.

Share/Save

Comments

2 Responses to “Complain for free”

  1. JerseyRaindog on December 14th, 2006 10:29 am

    I use Getty a lot. For searching purposes only. They’re way too expensive. Anything you find on Getty you can usually find on one of the many other image library sites as well (normally with a negotiable discount - which Getty don’t do). And yup, istock is the new way to do images. I pretty much use them every day for something now. Quality varies, but so do client’s wallets. As for the the blogging point; you gotta pay for what you use. Just like music you ‘find’ on the web. *cough.

  2. William Faulkner on September 27th, 2007 12:51 pm

    Regarding the use of PicScouts services:

    PicScout Bots crawl the entire web - every blogger and webmaster I know has had his site scraped.

    Be aware that the subversive and resource consuming techniques used by PicScouts bots, and the heavy-handed intimidating tactics used by their ‘debt’ collectors are causing a large degree on consternation amongst web-masters and the owners of web-sites (check the forums).

    Many of the webmasters I know are actively ceasing to use stock photography from clients of PicScout (Getty, Corbis, iStockPhoto etc) and going elsewhere if stock photography is required.

    I am 100% behind photographers and artists being paid for use of their copyright material - particularly as I have the artistic ability of a house brick and the photographic skills of a visually illiterate teenager - but cannot endorse the use of PicScout for various technical, ethical and social reasons.

    Please view my full articles on the subject before responding:

    PicScout Hacking:
    http://williamfaulkner.co.uk/wordpress/archives/84
    (http://tinyurl.com/yrsc8l)

    PicScout leads to intimidation:
    http://williamfaulkner.co.uk/wordpress/archives/85
    (http://tinyurl.com/23332k)

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!





Close
E-mail It
ss_blog_claim=a19df7f828f5b5361c562733c67c32f5